In early May 2025, Canada’s newly sworn Prime Minister Mark Carney flew to Washington to meet U.S. President Donald Trump. Carney, a former central banker turned politician, carried more than just trade files – he carried history. The brisk negotiations and public sparring over steel tariffs, softwood lumber, and even the now-resolved talk of annexation reminded everyone that this alliance is built on a long story of both cooperation and conflict. Americans were surprised to see a close neighbor targeted by nationalist rhetoric; Canadians were mindful that even friendly relations can fray under domestic pressure.

Across the centuries, this border has hosted an elaborate dance: Canada and the United States cutting deals one year, slapping each other with duties the next, yet always drawn back together by geography and economic gravity. In 2025, as Carney pressed the U.S. to protect Canadian interests while acknowledging American anxieties, he was echoing the roles of countless leaders before him. From the first free-trade treaty in 1854 to the latest North American trade pact, each chapter of this bilateral story has added depth to the partnership. Every flashpoint – whether a trade war or a joint war effort – has set the stage for the next era of negotiation. The “Carney visit” is itself just the latest turn in that endless cycle: a reminder that even intense disputes can give way to deeper interdependence.

Thus begins our journey through 150 years of U.S.–Canada economic ties. The pattern is clear: periods of close cooperation often alternate with episodes of friction, yet the long-term arc has bent toward greater integration. As we retrace this history – from the Canadian Confederation in 1867 to the post-pandemic world – one theme emerges in every decade: despite rivalry and setbacks, neither country can afford a destructive split with its neighbor. The conclusion of each era reinforces that lesson, and even now, with heated rhetoric in the air, cooler heads are already seeking a negotiated path forward. By the end, we will see that the border has bound these neighbors together more strongly than it has ever divided them.

I. Early Overtures and Setbacks (1867–1914)

When Canada became a Dominion in 1867, its economy was still largely tied to Britain and continental markets by geography and history. In 1854, even before Confederation, British North America had enjoyed a Reciprocity Treaty with the United States that eliminated tariffs on farm and forest products. That deal proved hugely profitable for both sides, but it ended abruptly in 1866 under U.S. pressure from protectionist politicians upset by Britain’s Civil War stance. The collapse of reciprocity helped spur Canada’s Confederation, but it also left a legacy: Canadians equated free trade with lost autonomy, and Americans saw their neighbor as a potential future economic appendage.

For the next decades, Canadian governments pursued an “Economic National Policy” – high tariffs and rail subsidies to spur domestic industry – while American manufacturers largely ignored Canada as a source of raw materials. South of the border, U.S. expansionism was on the minds of Canadians. When a young Speaker of the U.S. House, Champ Clark, bragged in 1911 that he looked forward to “the American flag [flying] over every square foot of British North America,” Canadians took notice. That year’s reciprocity treaty – negotiated by Prime Minister Wilfrid Laurier and President Taft – initially seemed to revive the spirit of 1854: lower tariffs on many natural products. But Clark’s speech and other hints about eventual annexation turned the treaty into a political poison pill in Canada. Conservatives led by Robert Borden warned voters that “annexation…[was] the ultimate, inevitable” result of free trade. In the fall 1911 election, fear of losing Canadian sovereignty won the day: Borden’s party swept to power and the treaty was abandoned.

By 1914, U.S.–Canada economic ties were cautious and restrained. Apart from lumber, minerals and a growing but limited amount of investment, the two economies remained largely separate – one leaning on Britain, the other expanding rapidly on its own. Diplomatically, Canada still often deferred to London, and the U.S. dealt more with British diplomats than Canadians. The formal establishment of U.S. and Canadian embassies in 1927 symbolized Canada’s coming of age, but on the eve of World War I, trade relations were still governed by mutual respect and suspicion. Each side saw opportunity in the other’s market, yet neither side fully trusted that economic closeness could avoid political conflict. As historian Allan Gotlieb has observed, the tilt of Canada’s economy had begun shifting north–south in this era, not by design but by the pull of market forces. In short, the stage was set for a trial by fire: a major crisis would soon force these neighbors to reassess how tightly they wanted to bind their futures.

II. War, Depression, and Wartime Cooperation (1914–1945)

World War I began the great realignment. In 1914, Canada entered World War I not by its own decision, but as a dominion of Britain, whose declaration of war applied across the Empire. The United States stayed neutral until 1917 and prospered through booming trade with the Allied powers. Canadian politicians quietly resented that 1914–17 gap: they saw their young soldiers and economy drained for an allied cause while American factories flourished. But when the U.S. finally entered the war, those old grudges evaporated in a flood of cooperation.

From 1917 to 1918, the two countries coordinated closely, creating an unprecedented level of wartime economic cooperation. Railways and ports were coordinated to move men and materiel; American banks bought Canadian war bonds; thousands of American farm workers were sent north to harvest grain while Canadian troops fought overseas. Meanwhile Canada’s factories – some with direct U.S. capital and technical aid – produced munitions that flowed to Britain and France. By war’s end the two economies were entwined like never before, united in a common cause that nurtured personal ties and trust.

After 1918, Canada emerged with new autonomy on the world stage, signing the Treaty of Versailles separately and gaining a place in the League of Nations. It also carried its newfound confidence into economic diplomacy. The Roaring Twenties were an age of high tariffs in general – the U.S. turned inward, and Canada joined Britain’s preferential tariffs under its Empire network. Yet even amid protectionism, cross-border business boomed. American investors poured money into Canadian pulp mills, mines, railroads and especially auto “branch plants.” By the mid-1920s the United States had quietly become Canada’s biggest market for wheat, timber, and oil, while Canada bought American machinery, cars and capital. In short, the two economies grew together in spite of policy barriers. In diplomacy, the war bond of alliance matured as well: for example, Prime Minister Mackenzie King visited the U.S. in 1923 as the first Canadian premier hosted by a sitting American president. But no new treaty on tariffs emerged; on trade, the partnership remained informal and episodic.

The Great Depression shattered that comfortable pattern. In 1930 the U.S. Congress passed the Smoot–Hawley Tariff, choking off imports. Canada, reeling, retaliated almost immediately with its own high duties on American goods. A brief tariff war ensued, deepening the crash for both economies. Canada then turned to the British Empire for trade, culminating in the Ottawa Agreements of 1932. For the first time in decades, Canada shifted significant purchases away from the United States. Politically, however, relations stayed largely cordial – neither side wanted an ideological breach. By the mid-1930s, shared hardship produced pragmatism. U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act (1934) gave him power to cut tariffs through negotiated deals. Canadian elections in 1935 returned King, who opened talks with Washington. The result was the U.S.–Canada Trade Agreement of 1935: both countries slashed duties on dozens of goods, healing much of the damage. An even bigger pact followed in 1938. These agreements, brokered in warm personal rapport between King and Roosevelt, showed that the logic of mutual benefit could trump protectionism even after a serious fallout. Roosevelt and King coordinated on infrastructure too, for example preliminary plans for the St. Lawrence Seaway.

When World War II erupted in 1939, the U.S. and Canada accelerated this teamwork. Even before Pearl Harbor, American resources flowed north to keep Canada’s factories humming on wartime lines, while Canada shipped food, metals, and oil southward. In 1940 the two governments established the Permanent Joint Board on Defense to plan continental security. In 1941, Roosevelt and Mackenzie King went further: they signed the Hyde Park Agreements, which treated war goods made by one country for the other as if each country was ‘buying’ from itself. In practice, Canada’s warplane and vehicle plants became extensions of the American arsenal, aided by U.S. Lend-Lease funds. By war’s end in 1945, North America had truly functioned as a single manufacturing engine for the Allied cause. The Great Depression’s trade walls were broken for good; in their place rose trust and open channels built in common sacrifice.

III. Postwar Boom and Continental Integration (1945–1970)

The peace of 1945 ushered in an unprecedented era of prosperity and integration. Both countries helped shape the new multilateral order: Canada and the U.S. co-founded the United Nations, NATO and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Lower trade barriers globally reinforced what had become a de facto free-trade zone at the northern border. The U.S. market boomed under Baby Boom consumer demand and postwar investment; Canada rode the wave. By the early 1950s, the United States had overtaken Britain to become Canada’s largest customer and source of investment. Canadian exports of staples – grains, timber, minerals and rapidly expanding oil – flowed south in vast volume, while the U.S. supplied Canada with machinery, automobiles and capital goods. Tariffs between the two countries were gradually peeled away via successive GATT rounds; even before any special bilateral treaty, duties fell from the double digits into the low single digits.

One iconic symbol of this golden age was the Auto Pact of 1965, negotiated between President Lyndon Johnson and Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson. Johnson eliminated U.S. tariffs on Canadian cars and parts, while Canada agreed to keep a share of assembly jobs. The result: a single North American auto industry was born. Engines cast in Windsor could end up in Detroit cars, and cars made in Flint could sell in Ottawa without extra tax. For the first time, plants on both sides of the border retooled to serve the entire continent. The pact made cars cheaper and plants modernized – Canada went from a huge auto trade deficit to a surplus within years. More broadly, it pioneered “deep sectoral integration”: manufacturing became bi-national.

Those automobile alliances were mirrored in many industries. In 1950s and 1960s, hundreds of American firms set up branch plants in Canada, attracted by stable currency and shared culture. Pipelines built across the border (some dating back to 1940s, expanded in 1950s) made Canada a secure petroleum supplier to the U.S. By 1970, an astonishing 70 percent of Canada’s exports went to the United States (and an equally large share of imports came from there). Jobs intertwined – from Michigan autoworkers with Canadian parts to Canadian aluminum smelters selling to U.S. beverage companies – and people regarded the other country not as “foreign” but as an extension of home.

Politically, relations remained friendly. Occasional diplomatic frictions over Vietnam or China did not halt trade growth. U.S. presidents visited Canada (and vice versa) to celebrate the friendship; Canadians cooperated on continental matters like Great Lakes pollution. In short, the decades after 1945 proved the value of partnership. Each setback of the early 20th century – distrust, tariffs and war – had given way to an abiding conviction: North America, when open and cooperative, created prosperity for both. This trusting era laid the economic foundation for the next half-century.

IV. Turbulence and Rebalancing (1970s–1980s)

The long boom finally hit turbulence in the 1970s. Both countries faced inflation and oil shocks, and some of their old certainties were shaken. In 1971 President Richard Nixon stunned the world by unilaterally scrapping the Bretton Woods currency system and imposing a 10 percent import surcharge on all goods, to protect the U.S. dollar. Canada was caught off-guard: one day its aluminum and lumber exports were tax-free, the next day they faced U.S. surcharges. Ottawa had no formal warning, and although the tax was lifted after a few months, the message was clear. Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau (a fierce believer in Canadian sovereignty) took note: he told Canadians they needed a “third option” beyond dependence on the U.S.. His government launched policies to diversify trade toward Europe and Asia. In practice the geography did not change – Canadians still sold 70% of exports to the U.S. – but the initiative signaled Ottawa’s determination to guard against abrupt U.S. policy swings.

The 1973 oil crisis added another layer. Canada was by now a net oil exporter, thanks to big discoveries in Alberta and new pipelines to U.S. refineries. When OPEC’s embargo sent world oil prices soaring, energy security suddenly became a strategic concern in Washington – and Canada held a valuable resource. Trudeau’s government responded in 1980 with the National Energy Program (NEP), a plan to guarantee low domestic oil prices and to shift more oil revenues to Ottawa and Canadian companies. This move wasn’t primarily aimed at the U.S., but it infuriated American oil firms and policymakers. They charged that the NEP undercut market pricing and risked limiting U.S. access to Canadian oil at a sensitive time. Canadian provinces and U.S. investors both reacted strongly – this was one of the biggest rifts in modern economic relations. For the first time in decades, relations were strained not by Soviet politics or global war, but by a purely economic policy. Still, trade flows never stopped: even in the 1980s Canadians kept pumping oil south and Washington kept the border open for most goods. This episode showed how deeply twined the economies were: Canada’s bid for more independence on energy created broad alarm, and ultimately the NEP was dismantled later in the 1980s, leaving some mistrust behind.

Aside from energy, other disputes simmered during these decades. U.S. lumber, wheat and dairy lobbies pressed hard in Washington whenever they felt Canada was getting an unfair advantage. Canada grumbled about U.S. farm subsidies and auto protection. But most of these irritants were handled quietly under GATT rules or diplomatic talks. For example, in 1972 the two governments cooperated on the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement rather than letting pollution become a trade issue. Both sides tried to contain specific conflicts so the overall trade relationship would not break down. Yet the curtain was drawn on a new realization: by 1980, many Canadian economists and business leaders believed that greater access to U.S. markets was actually the best way to revive Canada’s own growth. Free-trade ideas – once taboo – began to gain traction.

The election of Progressive Conservative Brian Mulroney as Prime Minister in 1984 marked a turning point. Mulroney ran on a platform of closer ties with the United States, a sharp change from Trudeau’s cautious stance. He immediately struck up a strong personal rapport with President Ronald Reagan, setting the scene for a historic transformation. In 1988 – just a few years after Mulroney took office – Canada and the U.S. negotiated the first-ever bilateral free trade agreement, eliminating most tariffs between them. When NAFTA (adding Mexico) extended this in 1994, the free-trade era was fully inaugurated (see next section).

V. NAFTA and the New Millennium (1990s–2016)

The North American Free Trade Agreement was signed in 1992 by Prime Minister Mulroney, U.S. President George H. W. Bush and Mexican President Salinas. It built on the 1988 Canada–U.S. FTA by bringing Mexico into a continent‑wide market of 400 million people. For Canadians, NAFTA meant what it said: most U.S.–Canada trade barriers were swept aside (with a few holdouts like dairy protection) and continental supply chains were ratified. Canada’s longtime worry about U.S. competition with Mexico proved more rhetorical than real; economists generally agree that NAFTA mainly locked in the status quo for Canada while offering modest gains in new markets. After fierce debates, Canada’s incoming government in 1993 (which had opposed the earlier FTA) chose pragmatism and accepted NAFTA, deciding that stability was more important than reopening a settled issue.

Under NAFTA, integration deepened. Truckloads of goods and services flowed in both directions across the 49th parallel. Tariffs on remaining “sensitive” products were phased out over years, and new disciplines on investment, intellectual property, and dispute resolution were established. By the early 2000s, the results were striking: total annual trade in goods and services between the U.S. and Canada had roughly doubled from pre-1990 levels. Manufacturers and consumers alike reaped the benefits. The vision of North American assembly lines was realized beyond autos: aerospace parts, electronics and even agricultural inputs now crossed the border multiple times during production. One car might be designed in Detroit, painted in Windsor, and have upholstery stitched in Monterrey, all tariff-free. In essence, the Auto Pact of the 1960s had grown into a continent‑wide industry.

The 1990s and 2000s were prosperous overall for both neighbors, even if some sectors shrank. Canada suffered a brief recession in the early 1990s while it retooled for competition, but by the late 1990s its economy was booming alongside America’s. Canadian unemployment fell and budgets balanced in part thanks to exports like pulp, lumber, and energy flowing into a U.S. tech-and-growth economy. The United States, for its part, enjoyed the dot‑com and housing boom of the 1990s, and for the most part saw Canada as a quiet and reliable partner. Politically, differences were carefully compartmentalized: for example, Canada’s decision not to join the 2003 Iraq War created diplomatic frost, but it did not spill over into trade. The mantra became “agree to disagree” on such issues, while keeping cross-border commerce open.

That said, some disputes remained stubborn. The most notorious was the softwood lumber conflict: U.S. sawmillers accused Canada’s provincially run forestry sector of unfair subsidies. Despite repeated NAFTA panel victories for Canada, the U.S. Congress overrode NAFTA rules several times to slap duties on Canadian timber. The cycle repeated into the 2010s (a last agreement in 2006 expired in 2015), showing that even under free trade, domestic pressures can revive old controversies. Agriculture also saw friction: American dairy lobbies pushed for Canadian market access despite Canada’s protected supply‑management system. Fisheries, steel rules and intellectual property standards saw their own skirmishes. Nevertheless, by the 2010s total bilateral trade in goods and services topped $700 billion a year, one of the world’s largest economic relationships. Both governments even negotiated detailed side‑agreements on food safety, environmental protection and energy cooperation. In particular, energy trade boomed: Canada became by far America’s largest supplier of foreign oil and gas (a trend only accelerated by new pipelines and liquefied natural gas projects). The continent was now woven together in countless ways – a reality underscored by President Eisenhower’s old idea of a “North American defense perimeter” – and commerce marched on despite the occasional setback.

VI. Trade Under Strain: The Trump Era and Its Continuities (2016–2025)

The 2010s closed with a new challenge. In 2017, Donald J. Trump took office promising an America First agenda—and immediately targeted NAFTA as a symbol of unfair trade. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who had inherited NAFTA’s uneasy political legacy, saw renegotiation looming. U.S.-Canada talks were unlike any before: characterized by high-profile leaks, presidential outbursts, and pressure from protectionist interest groups. Trump demanded deeper concessions from Canada on dairy access, stricter auto rules to spur U.S. plants, and a five-year sunset clause—a far cry from the open-ended pact of old. Canada’s trade team, led by Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland, pushed back with equal resolve, insisting on preserving core NAFTA guarantees such as dispute panels and sectoral protections.

After months of diplomatic turbulence, a deal was struck in late 2018. The United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), which entered into force in July 2020, preserved the core of NAFTA while modernizing its terms. It tightened rules of origin for the auto sector, expanded U.S. access to Canada’s dairy market, and updated chapters on digital trade, labor, and environmental standards. Crucially, Canada maintained the integrity of its investor protection mechanisms and avoided a sunset clause, settling instead for a 16-year review cycle. While the agreement bore Trump’s imprint, it reflected a familiar outcome: after pressure and provocation, both sides opted for continuity over rupture.

But the path to that agreement had left bruises. In 2018, Trump imposed national security tariffs—25% on steel and 10% on aluminum—including against Canada. For Ottawa, this was a diplomatic shock. Canada, after all, was not only a military ally but a supplier of critical materials to U.S. defense industries. Trudeau publicly called the decision “insulting,” and Canada responded with retaliatory tariffs targeting emblematic American goods: bourbon, jeans, and maple syrup. A brief but intense trade skirmish unfolded, straining ties at the G7 summit in Quebec, where Trump’s harsh words toward Trudeau reverberated across both countries.

By mid-2019, the tariffs were lifted as part of the broader USMCA compromise. But trust had been dented. Canadian policymakers and business leaders began to treat U.S. trade unpredictability as a structural risk. And although trade flows recovered under the new agreement, the experience hardened Canadian resolve to diversify markets and reinforce domestic supply chains.

That tension carried over into Trump’s second presidency. Re-elected in 2024, he returned to office in early 2025 with a renewed mandate to challenge existing trade arrangements. Within weeks, his administration floated new tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber—a perennial source of grievance—and signaled scrutiny of potash exports, citing unfair competition and energy dependency. On social media, Trump renewed his rhetoric about “the raw deal” with Canada and mused aloud about “straightening the line” on the northern border.

In Ottawa, newly elected Prime Minister Mark Carney responded with a strategy both assertive and pragmatic. A seasoned economist and former central banker, Carney approached the White House summit in May 2025 with careful preparation. He brought detailed figures: Canada remained the United States’ largest customer; nearly half the content of a typical Canadian-assembled car was American; Canadian minerals powered U.S. electric vehicle batteries. With calm resolve, Carney made clear that Canada was “not for sale” but also “not looking for a fight.”

Behind closed doors, tensions gave way to deals. The two governments announced the formation of a joint task force on critical minerals, aimed at securing supplies of lithium, nickel, and cobalt for North American industries. They agreed to coordinate cross-border responses to the fentanyl crisis, including data sharing and port-of-entry monitoring. They also pledged to modernize trade infrastructure at key crossings, streamlining customs for trusted goods and services.

Notably, the United States agreed—at least temporarily—not to proceed with new tariffs on lumber or potash, pending further discussion. In exchange, Canada committed to increased transparency on forest management and offered to deepen cooperation on clean energy and electric vehicle supply chains.

These were not transformative accords. But they were real—and they reinforced a familiar pattern. Once again, the relationship bent under pressure but did not break. The Carney–Trump exchange echoed earlier cycles: public confrontation giving way to quiet recalibration. The same dynamics that had shaped the 1987 FTA, the 2008 auto bailouts, or the 2018 USMCA renegotiation reappeared in 2025. And in each case, the deeper structure of mutual interest prevailed over volatility at the top.

If the Trump years revealed anything, it is that even the fiercest rhetoric does not erase economic gravity. The United States may assert primacy. Canada may defend its independence. But the space in between—hard-won, frequently contested, yet undeniably vital—is where cooperation endures.

VII. The Road Ahead: Between Gravity and Choice

The May 2025 encounter between President Trump and Prime Minister Carney was more than a moment of negotiation. It was a mirror — of what this relationship has always been: difficult, asymmetrical, but indispensable. And it signaled something more enduring than the agreements themselves. Despite sharp rhetoric, mutual frustrations, and competing political agendas, the encounter reaffirmed a truth shaped by more than a century of shared history: cooperation between the United States and Canada is not a gesture of goodwill — it is a strategic necessity.

In 2025, the United States and Canada no longer debate whether to cooperate — they debate how, and on what terms. After more than 150 years of trade, dispute, compromise, and realignment, the relationship is no longer a question of convenience or circumstance. It is a fact of geography and a product of political will. But that doesn’t mean it is inevitable, or immune to erosion.

Today, the economic ties that bind Canada and the U.S. run deeper than pipelines and tariffs. They thread through shared infrastructure, integrated labor markets, co-developed technologies, and common environmental challenges. What lies ahead is not the consolidation of a past model, but the invention of a new one. Clean energy corridors, semiconductor alliances, rare earth strategies, and digital sovereignty — these are not just policy issues, but the scaffolding of the next continental chapter.

Yet for all their economic logic, none of these projects are guaranteed. What history teaches is that integration requires stewardship. Each generation must choose — deliberately — to sustain, reform, and reimagine the relationship. Left unattended, even the strongest alliances drift. Sovereignty and solidarity are not incompatible, but they must be negotiated anew each time the context changes.

Looking back to 1867, it is striking how much has been built not on inevitability, but on conviction — that cooperation can be shaped without domination, that independence can coexist with interdependence. From the failure of reciprocity in 1911 to the recalibration of NAFTA under duress, the two countries have often disagreed, sometimes bitterly. But the long arc shows something rarer than harmony: durable trust amid asymmetry.

As we face a century of climate disruption, demographic shifts, and technological upheaval, the challenge for Canada and the United States is not simply to avoid conflict. It is to craft common purpose at scale. That requires not nostalgia, but imagination.

The border will always exist — but what it represents, a limit or a link, remains a choice. And perhaps that is the quiet strength of this relationship: that it is not held together by sentiment, or force, or fantasy, but by a mutual recognition that the most powerful alliances are not those that erase difference, but those that can endure it — and build through it.

Welcome to the conversation.

---

Bibliography:

Barry, Donald, and Duane Bratt, eds. 2014. Canada and the United States: Differences that Count. 4th ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Bothwell, Robert. 2015. Your Country, My Country: A Unified History of the United States and Canada. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Clarkson, Stephen. 2002. Uncle Sam and Us: Globalization, Neoconservatism, and the Canadian State. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Granatstein, J. L. 1996. Yankee Go Home?: Canadians and Anti-Americanism. Toronto: HarperCollins Canada.

Hart, Michael. 2002. A Trading Nation: Canadian Trade Policy from Colonialism to Globalization. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

Hillmer, Norman, and J. L. Granatstein, eds. 2008. Empire to Umpire: Canada and the World into the 21st Century. Toronto: Thomson Nelson.

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, and Jeffrey J. Schott. 2005. NAFTA Revisited: Achievements and Challenges. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

James, Patrick, and Mark J. Kasoff, eds. 2013. Canadian Studies in the New Millennium. 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Pastor, Robert A. 2001. Toward a North American Community: Lessons from the Old World for the New. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

Thompson, John Herd, and Stephen J. Randall. 2008. Canada and the United States: Ambivalent Allies. 4th ed. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

---