Author’s Note: Introducing a New Category of In-Depth Essays

This article marks the beginning of a new type of post here on US Politics and History.

Unlike the shorter essays and reflections that usually appear on the blog, this is a long-form, in-depth exploration. It reflects a commitment to occasionally dive deeper into complex topics that cannot be fully addressed in a few paragraphs. These extended essays will offer a more comprehensive analysis — combining historical context, current dynamics, and critical reflection — while remaining accessible to curious readers.

The subject of American military culture, and the evolving role of veterans within society, seemed particularly suited for this inaugural long-form piece. It touches on history, politics, values, and the civic soul of the nation — core themes of this platform.

You will continue to find shorter essays on the blog as well, but from time to time, these deeper explorations will offer a broader perspective on the forces that shape American democracy.

Thank you for reading — and for being part of this journey into the deeper currents of history and political life.

— Quentin Detilleux

---

The United States was, in part, forged in uniform. From the insurgent thirteen colonies to the deserts of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan, the American military occupies a singular place within the national identity. Even today, stars and stripes and uniforms are ubiquitous during public ceremonies, sports events, and national holidays. How does military culture shape American values and society? And more importantly, what is the role of the veteran, a symbolic figure simultaneously glorified as a hero and recognized as a victim, in the American collective consciousness? This essay explores, with a critical yet thoughtful lens, how military service and culture have shaped — and continue to shape — the fabric of American civil society.

Military Culture and American Values

Since the founding of the republic, the values associated with the military — discipline, duty, loyalty, courage — have intertwined with American civic values. Patriotism, in particular, is inseparable from military culture. A 2008 Gallup poll showed that 62% of Americans considered military service to be among the strongest expressions of patriotism, just behind voting. In the collective imagination, serving under the flag remains a noble act, a testimony of commitment to the nation. The military explicitly promotes seven core values — loyalty, duty, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity, and personal courage — which closely align with the civic virtues emphasized in public American discourse.

These military values permeate society through multiple channels. In many schools, respect for the flag and daily pledges of allegiance echo quasi-military discipline. At major sporting events, it is common to honor the troops or veterans on the field, reinforcing the association between national pride and military honor. Similarly, holidays such as Memorial Day (commemorating fallen soldiers) and Veterans Day (honoring living veterans) are civic highlights marked by parades, official speeches, and moments of remembrance. These public rituals demonstrate the near-universal admiration enjoyed by the military within the American population.

This admiration comes with an idealization of the soldier figure. American popular culture is filled with brave and virtuous military heroes, from the victorious GI of World War II to the modern Navy SEAL in action films. Of course, more critical works exist and show the darker side of war, but the dominant image of the military remains positive. For many Americans, the military is an exemplary institution that embodies national unity and the defense of freedom. In opinion polls, the armed forces consistently rank among the most trusted institutions — a further sign of the profound cultural connection between military life and American values.

The American Veteran: National Hero, Sacrificed Victim, or Ordinary Citizen?

At the heart of military culture lies the veteran, a former soldier returned to civilian life, occupying a powerful symbolic space in the United States. In American society, the veteran is often seen as an ideal citizen who selflessly served the country, or as a hero to whom the nation owes a debt. At the same time, another stereotype coexists: that of the wounded veteran, scarred by the trials of combat — a “wounded survivor” carrying the invisible trauma of war. These dual images — hero and victim — grant the veteran a unique status, surrounded by a blend of respect and compassion.

Research shows that Americans massively associate positive qualities with veterans. A 2023 RAND Corporation study revealed that the vast majority of citizens perceive veterans as disciplined, loyal, responsible, and autonomous, while few attribute negative traits to them. Concretely, between 50% and 80% of respondents associate veterans with discipline or loyalty, and less than 10% see them as “cold” or “distant.” These figures confirm the overwhelmingly positive aura surrounding former soldiers in public opinion. This valorization manifests in multiple ways. In everyday life, it is common for a civilian to thank a veteran with a handshake and a “Thank you for your service” — a nearly ritualistic expression since the 2000s. Many companies offer discounts to veterans, some public services provide priority lines, and the media frequently highlight exemplary veterans — whether a former Marine turned humanitarian or a homeless veteran aided by a community. Politically, displaying one’s veteran status is generally an asset for a candidate: it signals sacrifice and leadership experience.

However, the flattering portrayal of the veteran-hero has its downside. It can obscure the diversity of veterans’ experiences and the very real difficulties many face. Beneath the image of the “hero who asks for nothing,” many veterans suffer profound distress upon returning to civilian life. Invisible wounds — PTSD, depression, traumatic brain injuries — weigh heavily on this population. Between 2008 and 2016, more than 6,000 veteran suicides occurred each year — averaging nearly 20 per day. This staggering figure far exceeds the number of U.S. soldiers killed in combat during the same period.

Thus, the symbolic, glorified veteran coexists with a darker reality: former soldiers in distress, sometimes marginalized after the wars end. The social representation of the veteran oscillates between pride and pity, admiration and concern. Conscious of this duality, the U.S. government seeks both to honor veterans and to respond to their specific needs. The vast Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) manages hundreds of hospitals and aid centers dedicated to them. Educational and professional programs — descendants of the famous G.I. Bill of 1944 — provide training, home loans, and other assistance to ease reintegration. These measures rely on an implicit social contract: the nation recognizes a “sacrifice debt” toward those who served and commits to supporting them. In return, the veteran is expected to once again become an active citizen contributing to the common good.

Military and Society: From Conscription to Volunteerism

If the figure of the veteran holds such cultural importance, it is because military experience has touched a broad part of American families throughout history — though this reality has evolved sharply in recent decades. How much of the population serves or has served, and how has this changed over time? The answer offers critical insight into the relationship between the military and society.

At the end of World War II, the U.S. military was truly a mass army. In 1945, more than 12 million Americans were under arms, in a country with a much smaller total population than today. Conscription was the norm during major twentieth-century conflicts and the early decades of the Cold War. As recently as 1980, about 18% of adult Americans were veterans — nearly one in five. This meant that nearly every household had a father, son, husband, or brother who had worn the uniform, reinforcing the deep integration of military culture into the nation’s social fabric.

Everything changed after the 1970s. In 1973, traumatized by the Vietnam War, the United States ended the draft and transitioned to an entirely volunteer military. Gradually, the proportion of citizens with military experience dropped. In 2023, there were only 15.8 million veterans among nearly 260 million adults — just 6.1% of the adult population. In forty years, the proportion of veterans has been cut by two-thirds. Likewise, the size of the active-duty force has shrunk dramatically: in 2023, the U.S. military counts about 1.3 million active-duty personnel, compared to 3.5 million at the peak of the Vietnam War in the late 1960s. Today, less than 1% of Americans serve in uniform, a striking contrast to past generations.

This evolution carries profound cultural consequences. On one hand, the image of the soldier has gained prestige as service shifted from a mass obligation to an elite, voluntary commitment. On the other hand, a growing gulf of understanding has emerged between the civilian population and the military world. Fewer and fewer Americans personally know someone who has served, especially among younger generations. In 1995, about 40% of Americans aged 18–24 had a parent who was a veteran; today that number is significantly lower.

Military service is increasingly becoming a family tradition: young people from military families are far more likely to enlist than those without such ties. Some sociologists speak of an emerging “warrior caste,” where military service runs in the family while the majority of society remains distant.

To sustain its volunteer ranks, recruitment has become a societal challenge. The armed services compete to attract young people with advertising campaigns emphasizing adventure, heroism, educational benefits, and career skills. Despite these efforts, recruitment has become increasingly difficult. The Pentagon worries about a recruiting crisis: only about 9% of Americans aged 16–24 say they are willing to consider a military career, the lowest rate recorded in decades. Several factors explain this decline: the lack of an existential threat since the Cold War, a strong civilian job market, parental and educator reluctance to endorse potentially dangerous paths, and less glamorous perceptions of the military after the long, difficult wars of the post-9/11 era.

Another factor complicating recruitment is the shrinking pool of eligible young Americans. Health problems, insufficient education, or criminal records disqualify many candidates. Authorities estimated that in 2020, only about 23% of Americans aged 17–24 met the requirements for enlistment, down from 29% in 2016. For example, one in three young Americans is too overweight to meet military fitness standards. Facing this narrow pipeline, the military has adapted by offering generous enlistment bonuses, relaxing some standards (regarding tattoos, past cannabis use, educational records), and creating preparatory programs to help marginal candidates meet requirements.

Despite these efforts, several service branches — the Army, Navy, and Air Force — have failed to meet their recruiting targets in 2022 and 2023, sometimes falling short by as much as 25%. The decline in the number of veterans and the increased selectivity of military service have created a new and unprecedented relationship between American society and its armed forces. On one hand, the active-duty military forms a relatively small, professional body whose members most civilians encounter only indirectly — through films, video games, or occasional airport interactions. On the other hand, public support for the troops remains higher than ever, perhaps precisely because so few citizens are asked to sacrifice personally.

This curious equilibrium reflects a paradox: enthusiastic public support for “our troops” coexists with a daily life largely untouched by war, where military service is carried by a small voluntary minority.

World War II: The Golden Age of the Citizen-Soldier

To fully understand the impact of military culture on American society, we must revisit its major historical evolutions. The turning point of World War II (1941–1945) is a critical place to start, as it profoundly shaped American mentalities. This total conflict mobilized 16 million Americans in uniform (over 400,000 of whom did not return alive) and required an unprecedented effort from the entire population. The conscripted army at that time reflected the whole nation: men from all social classes served together in regiments, while the home front organized around rationing, scrap drives, and war bonds.

This era cemented the myth of the “citizen-soldier,” the ordinary man who leaves his home to defend democracy and liberate the world from fascism. The victory of 1945 elevated American soldiers to the rank of global saviors of freedom. Domestically, national cohesion reached its peak: returning soldiers were greeted with parades, and society at large was deeply grateful. The government facilitated their reintegration through the landmark G.I. Bill, offering veterans funding for education, homeownership, and business creation. Millions of former soldiers thus gained access to higher education and property ownership, fueling the growth of a prosperous postwar middle class.

Culturally, the 1940s and 1950s were a golden age for the military’s image. Patriotism was a unifying force, further galvanized by the early Cold War confrontation with the Soviet Union. The image of Marines raising the flag at Iwo Jima became an iconic symbol, celebrated in monuments and collective memory. The military was even seen as a progressive force in some respects: in 1948, President Truman ordered the desegregation of the armed forces, making the military one of the first American institutions to integrate racially, ahead of much of the civilian sector.

Thus, during World War II and the decade that followed, military culture appeared largely aligned with national values of unity, meritocracy, and freedom. The veteran was primarily a pillar of the community, modest yet universally respected for his role in defeating tyranny.

Vietnam and the Shattering of the Military Consensus

Starting in the 1960s, the patriotic consensus surrounding the military unraveled, largely due to the Vietnam War (1964–1973). This conflict, fought in the name of containing communism, became increasingly unpopular. The U.S. had to draft hundreds of thousands of young men for a distant and ambiguous war. As years passed, a significant portion of American youth—the Baby Boomers—rebelled against the draft and government war policies. Massive protests erupted on college campuses and in major cities, chanting pacifist slogans and denouncing atrocities committed in Vietnam.

By 1968, a majority of Americans believed that sending troops to Vietnam had been a mistake. This era saw a deep societal divide emerge. On one side were the hawks who supported the war in the name of patriotism and anti-communism; on the other, the doves who questioned the morality and strategic wisdom of the intervention.

Caught in the middle were the soldiers and returning veterans, who often bore the brunt of public anger. In the American collective memory, the Vietnam veteran became a tragic figure: a young man, often from a working-class background, surviving the horrors of the jungle only to return home to a divided nation. No triumphant parades awaited these veterans. Instead, many recounted experiencing indifference, suspicion, or outright hostility upon their return.

Literature and cinema later explored this fracture: from First Blood (Rambo) to the novels of Tim O’Brien, the Vietnam veteran was depicted as misunderstood, traumatized, and alienated from the society he fought for. The cultural impact of Vietnam was thus paradoxical. On one hand, it fueled deep skepticism toward the military and the government, particularly in progressive circles. On the other, it fostered a belated recognition of the need to separate the soldier from the war.

By the late 1970s and 1980s, America sought to rehabilitate the image of the soldier regardless of the politics of the conflict. Monuments like the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, inaugurated in 1982, became powerful national symbols. Designed as a somber, reflective wall engraved with the names of the fallen, the memorial underscored a new attitude: a nation might regret a war but still honor those who fought in it.

Simultaneously, the end of the draft in 1973 transformed the military into a more professional, apolitical force. Under President Reagan in the 1980s, a resurgence of patriotism reframed Vietnam as a “noble cause” betrayed by political mismanagement. Popular culture followed suit: action movies such as Top Gun (1986) restored the image of the confident, heroic American soldier. Even Vietnam trauma was symbolically “redeemed” in films like Rambo II, where the hero returns to rescue American POWs, rewriting history with an imagined victory. Thus, by the 1980s, the military was back in the American public’s good graces—although the wounds of Vietnam would never fully heal.

The Post-9/11 Era: Renewed Patriotism and Endless Wars

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, triggered a patriotic surge unparalleled since Pearl Harbor. The American military, called upon to avenge the attacks and defend the homeland, saw its public approval soar to historic heights. The early stages of the wars in Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003) were widely supported. Crowds waved flags as troops deployed, patriotic songs filled public ceremonies, and “Support Our Troops” magnets adorned millions of cars.

Unlike during Vietnam, few dared to criticize individual soldiers. Even opponents of the Iraq War were careful to distinguish between the war and the warrior — a major cultural shift since the 1970s. Throughout the 2000s, public admiration for the military remained high. Stadiums erupted in standing ovations when service members were honored during games. Airports organized spontaneous celebrations for returning troops. Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan were widely recognized as heroes.

Yet, these wars dragged on. In Iraq, an insurgency led to escalating casualties and public disillusionment. By 2005–2006, a majority of Americans considered the invasion of Iraq a mistake. Afghanistan, too, evolved from a quick intervention to a long, grinding occupation. Despite growing doubts about these conflicts, support for the troops remained firm. “Hate the war, love the warrior” became a common refrain. This dynamic produced a paradox: never had American soldiers been more honored — yet never had so few citizens shared their experience.

Meanwhile, the military itself continued to evolve. Women gained access to all combat roles in 2013. LGBTQ+ service members won greater acceptance with the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” in 2011. These changes reflected broader social shifts but also sparked fierce political debates. Some conservatives accused the military of succumbing to “woke” culture, warning that standards were being compromised. Others defended these reforms as necessary to ensure the military reflected the diversity and values of the democracy it served.

These controversies highlighted a deeper question: Can a military institution, traditionally associated with conservative values, adapt to a changing, pluralistic society without losing its effectiveness and cohesion? The post-9/11 era thus revealed both the resilience and the tensions within American military culture.

Today’s Veterans: Data, Challenges, and Contributions

Today, approximately 15.8 million adults in the United States are veterans, a number steadily declining as the World War II and Korean War generations pass away. The composition of the veteran community has also shifted: while men still constitute the majority, the share of women veterans continues to rise, reflecting changes in the military itself.

Roughly 43% of today’s veterans have served since 1990, a period that includes the Gulf War, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and numerous other deployments worldwide. These veterans embody the evolving nature of American conflict — from large-scale wars to counterinsurgency, nation-building, and complex peacekeeping operations.

Socially and economically, many veterans thrive. The discipline, leadership skills, and adaptability acquired during service often translate into success in business, education, and public service. Many veterans pursue degrees through the GI Bill, become entrepreneurs, or take leadership roles in civic organizations. Veteran-led nonprofits such as Team Rubicon and The Mission Continues demonstrate how service can be redirected toward rebuilding communities at home.

For instance, former Army Ranger Patrick Murphy, who served in Iraq, later became the first Iraq War veteran elected to Congress, championing veterans’ rights and education reform. Similarly, organizations like Team Rubicon, founded by Marine Corps veteran Jake Wood, show how veterans continue to lead at home, applying military precision and resilience to disaster relief efforts across the United States.

However, challenges remain profound and persistent.
Mental health is a major concern: studies indicate that up to 20% of veterans from recent conflicts suffer from PTSD or major depression. Reintegration into civilian life can be jarring, particularly for those returning from extended deployments or traumatic combat experiences. Even for those not suffering acute psychological wounds, the transition to a civilian workforce, social environment, and sense of purpose can be daunting.

Housing instability, although improved compared to previous decades, still affects tens of thousands of veterans annually. Unemployment among veterans has fluctuated but generally remains close to or slightly better than national averages — yet job satisfaction and long-term career fulfillment often lag behind expectations.

The tragedy of veteran suicide persists as a national crisis. Despite sustained efforts by the Department of Veterans Affairs and numerous private organizations, an estimated 6,000 veterans die by suicide each year, a staggering figure that underscores the enduring cost of military service long after the battlefield.

And yet, through resilience and determination, many veterans continue to serve as vital contributors to civic life — often acting as bridges between divided communities, mentors for younger generations, and living examples of service above self.

Honoring the Social Contract with Those Who Served

The veteran occupies a unique space in the American social contract: at once revered, sometimes neglected, and often misunderstood. Public admiration for the military is high, yet the day-to-day realities facing veterans rarely command sustained national attention.

There is a dissonance between rhetoric and reality. “Support our troops” is ubiquitous during moments of crisis, yet when wars fade from headlines, so too does the urgency of addressing veterans’ needs. The nation’s gratitude, while genuine, can sometimes ring hollow without corresponding action.

Historically, moments of intense military engagement have forged strong bonds between American society and its soldiers. After World War II, the GI Bill transformed millions of veterans into homeowners, students, and entrepreneurs, fundamentally reshaping the American middle class. Yet following other conflicts — notably the Vietnam War — veterans often returned to a society unprepared or unwilling to integrate them meaningfully.

Today, as the proportion of citizens with direct military experience declines, the risk grows that veterans will become symbolic figures rather than integrated citizens — honored from a distance but isolated from the mainstream of civic life.

Maintaining a healthy democracy demands more. Veterans should not merely be thanked; they should be empowered to continue serving as active participants in the civic, economic, and political life of the nation they defended.

As we reflect on the challenges veterans face today, it is worth remembering that this tension between service and recognition has deep roots. Throughout history, republics have grappled with the question of how to honor, integrate, and sustain those who fought in their defense.

From Citizen-Soldiers to Civic Guardians

The challenges facing American veterans today are not unprecedented.

The American Founding Fathers understood this intimately.
The Continental Army, formed from farmers, tradesmen, and artisans, fought a seemingly impossible war against the British Empire. After victory, these citizen-soldiers faced tremendous uncertainty: many returned home to find economic hardship and little governmental support.

The creation of the Society of the Cincinnati in 1783 — a fraternal organization of Revolutionary War officers — symbolized both pride in service and anxiety about the young republic’s obligations toward its veterans. Even George Washington, the quintessential citizen-soldier, pleaded with Congress to fulfill promises made to the army.

The Minutemen of Lexington and Concord embodied an ideal that resonates today: ordinary citizens rising to extraordinary service, not for conquest or personal glory, but for the preservation of a greater civic good. Their legacy reminds us that military service, in its noblest form, is an extension of citizenship, not a substitute for it.

Other republics have struggled with this balance.
In ancient Rome, veterans of the legions were often rewarded with land and political status — but as the republic gave way to empire, the growing power of military elites undermined democratic institutions. Rome’s failure was not in honoring its veterans, but in allowing the army to become detached from civic norms and civilian oversight.

America’s task, then, is both old and urgent: to ensure that its warriors return to the ranks of citizens, not as isolated heroes or invisible burdens, but as full participants in a shared democratic project.

The Enduring Lessons of Service

The story of America’s veterans is ultimately a story about citizenship itself.
It is about who serves, who sacrifices, and who bears responsibility for the republic’s survival.

When military service becomes the province of a small, self-selecting minority, democracy faces a risk: that the burdens of defense and the rights of citizenship become separated. When civilians cheer the troops but disengage from civic life — voting, community service, political participation — the social contract frays.

The inverse is equally true: when veterans are seen not merely as relics of war but as active bearers of civic virtue, society is enriched. Their experiences — of teamwork, sacrifice, resilience — are assets in every sector, from education to healthcare, from business to local government.

To achieve this, public policies must align rhetoric with reality:

• Ensuring robust mental health support for all veterans.
• Creating pathways for veterans to serve in civilian leadership roles.
• Encouraging narratives that portray veterans not as broken heroes, but as vital citizens.
• Revitalizing civic education so that all citizens, whether in uniform or not, understand their role in sustaining democracy.

Conclusion: Service, Sacrifice, and the Civic Soul

From the Minutemen who stood at Lexington Green to the veterans of Fallujah and Helmand Province, the American tradition of service is a living thread that connects generations — a thread woven not only with sacrifice and courage, but with the steadfast belief that freedom demands responsibility.

Veterans remind us that democracy is not self-sustaining.
It must be defended — sometimes with arms, always with commitment, and most of all with an enduring faith in the possibility of a common good.
Their service teaches us that liberty is never merely inherited; it must be renewed by each generation through action, memory, and civic devotion.

If we forget those who served, we forget the very ideals they fought for.
We risk reducing democracy to a distant abstraction, when in truth it lives — and sometimes dies — in the choices, sacrifices, and silences of real people.

The Republic endures not only because of the courage shown on battlefields, but because of the memory kept alive in each generation — in the telling of stories, the tending of graves, the vigilant defense of rights, and the quiet acts of service that honor the spirit of those who came before.

The legacy of the American veteran is not merely a legacy of war.
It is a legacy of democracy itself — imperfect, unfinished, but precious beyond measure.

In honoring that legacy, we do more than express gratitude.
We recommit ourselves to the ongoing work of citizenship: to building a nation worthy of their sacrifices, to remembering that the strength of a Republic lies not only in those who fight for it — but in those who cherish it, tend it, and strive to perfect it.

Service and sacrifice are not relics of history.
They are the lifeblood of the civic soul — and the enduring promise of the American future.

---

Sources

• Pew Research Center, The Changing Face of America’s Veteran Population (2023)
• RAND Corporation, What Americans Think About Veterans and Military Service (2023)
• U.S. Census Bureau, Veterans Day 2024: November 11
• U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Annual Suicide Prevention Report
• Gallup, Trust in Institutions (2001–2023)
• Military.com, Recruitment Crisis and Eligibility Trends (2022–2023)
• Team Rubicon and The Mission Continues (program reports)

---

Bibliography

The reflections presented in this essay draw from a wide body of scholarship and civic commentary on the evolving role of military service in American life. For readers interested in exploring these questions further, the following works offer rich historical, sociological, and political perspectives:

·       James Fallows, The Tragedy of the American Military (The Atlantic, 2014).

A landmark essay exploring the widening gap between American society and its professional military, and warning about the risks of superficial patriotism without real civic engagement.

·       Beth Bailey, America’s Army: Making the All-Volunteer Force (Harvard University Press, 2009).

A comprehensive history of how the shift to an all-volunteer force after Vietnam transformed not only the military but also American notions of citizenship, opportunity, and duty.

·       Andrew Bacevich, Breach of Trust: How Americans Failed Their Soldiers and Their Country (Metropolitan Books, 2013).

A passionate critique of how American civilians have disengaged from the costs and consequences of military service, urging a revival of shared national responsibility.

·       David Kennedy, The Will to Battle: The Soldier’s Burden in American History (Collected Essays and Lectures).

Insightful reflections on how American society has historically viewed its soldiers, balancing admiration with ambivalence, and what that reveals about the civic soul of the nation.

·       Richard H. Kohn, Eagle and Sword: The Beginnings of the Military Establishment in America (Free Press, 1975).

A foundational study of how America’s early leaders sought to balance military necessity with republican ideals, deeply shaping the citizen-soldier tradition.

·       David R. Segal and Mady Wechsler Segal, America’s Military Population (Population Bulletin, 2004).

An empirical overview of the changing demographics of the U.S. military, providing crucial context for understanding the social dynamics of service today.

·       Wilbur J. Scott, The Politics of Readjustment: Vietnam Veterans since the War (Transaction Publishers, 1993).

An in-depth analysis of the Vietnam veterans’ experience

---

Further Viewing

For readers interested in exploring the human and civic dimensions of military service through film and television, the following works offer powerful perspectives on the veteran experience and the challenges of reintegration:

• The Best Years of Our Lives (1946, William Wyler)
  A landmark portrayal of three WWII veterans struggling to rebuild their lives at home, capturing the civic and emotional aftermath of service.
• Band of Brothers (2001, HBO Miniseries)
  A moving chronicle of citizen-soldiers in WWII, emphasizing sacrifice, camaraderie, and the enduring bonds of service.
• Born on the Fourth of July (1989, Oliver Stone)
  The true story of Vietnam veteran Ron Kovic, tracing his journey from patriotic soldier to outspoken critic, illuminating the struggles for recognition and healing.
• Generation Kill (2008, HBO Miniseries)
  A raw, unfiltered depiction of Marines during the Iraq War, offering insight into the complexities of modern military life and the growing divide between soldiers and civilians.
• Thank You for Your Service (2017, Jason Hall)
  A sobering exploration of PTSD among Iraq War veterans, shedding light on the gap between public gratitude and real-world support.
• Warfare (2024, Ray Mendoza and Alex Garland)
  A stark and visceral portrayal of modern combat, focusing on the physical and psychological realities faced by soldiers on the ground, and reflecting on the enduring impact of war on identity, community, and the soul of a nation

Each of these works deepens our understanding of what it means to serve, to return, and to carry the weight of citizenship beyond the battlefield.