Author’s Note
As a European writer and student of American history, I approach this subject with humility. I am not Native American. This article is not written in the name of any community. It is an attempt to trace, through historical understanding, the long arc of Indigenous resistance to erasure — and to reflect on what that history reveals about the United States as a nation still reckoning with its origins.

---

I. The Dispossession Begins

When President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act into law in 1830, he formalized a logic that had been implicit since the earliest days of colonization: the land belonged not to those who lived on it, but to those powerful enough to take it. What followed was one of the most devastating policies of forced displacement in American history. The Trail of Tears, which saw the removal of the Cherokee, Choctaw, Creek, Chickasaw and Seminole nations to lands west of the Mississippi, left thousands dead and a legacy of trauma that still echoes.

The official rationale was “civilization” and “progress,” but the deeper motive was expansion — the hunger for land and resources. The Indigenous nations were not simply in the way; they were an obstacle to the American vision of prosperity. Native resistance was met with treaties made under duress, broken promises, military campaigns, and cultural erasure.

II. A Century of Resistance

Yet Native communities never disappeared. Throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, from the armed resistance of the Lakota at the Battle of Little Bighorn (1876), to the legal battles of the Pueblo and Navajo nations, to the activism of the American Indian Movement (AIM) in the 1970s, Indigenous peoples resisted — politically, culturally, and spiritually.

Their survival is a testament to resilience. Even when the U.S. government implemented assimilationist policies like the Dawes Act (1887), which broke up communal lands, or established boarding schools designed to “kill the Indian, save the man,” Native nations preserved languages, rituals, kinship, and identity. The 1934 Indian Reorganization Act marked a shift, allowing for greater tribal self-governance, but always within the constraints of federal authority.

The long arc of Native resistance is not linear. It moves through courtrooms, through art, through protest camps and sacred fire. It is neither nostalgic nor merely symbolic. It is ongoing.

III. Standing Rock: A Contemporary Echo

In 2016, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe stood in defiance of the Dakota Access Pipeline — a project that threatened their water supply and violated treaty protections. What began as a local act of protest quickly became a global movement of solidarity. Native and non-Native allies alike gathered at the Oceti Sakowin camp in North Dakota to defend Indigenous sovereignty and environmental justice.

What made Standing Rock so powerful was not only the urgency of the threat, but the weight of the history behind it. For Native people, this was not a new fight — it was the latest chapter in a centuries-long struggle for recognition, land, and self-determination.

Images of water protectors standing unarmed against militarized police echoed earlier chapters of American history — Selma, Wounded Knee, even the Boston Tea Party. But this was not a reenactment. It was a call to reckon with the unfinished business of American democracy.

IV. The Deeper Meaning of Sovereignty

In U.S. law, Native tribes are defined as “domestic dependent nations” — a category that recognizes certain elements of sovereignty but denies others. This legal ambiguity has often been used to justify paternalism and intrusion. But Indigenous sovereignty is not simply a legal status. It is a worldview.

Sovereignty means more than self-government. It means the right to define one’s own identity, protect sacred places, preserve relationships to the land, and pass knowledge across generations. It means refusing to vanish. It means insisting on being seen — not as relics of the past, but as nations with present and future claims.

V. Why This History Matters Now

At a time when many Americans are asking hard questions about the foundations of their republic, the story of Native sovereignty forces a deeper reflection. Who belongs? Who decides? What does justice mean when entire nations were built atop broken treaties?

The answers are not easy, nor should they be. But learning the history — and listening to the voices that carry it forward — is part of the work. As an outsider drawn to the complexity and contradictions of American history, I see this story not as marginal, but as central to understanding the American experiment.

Standing Rock did not end the pipeline. But it changed the conversation. It reminded the world that the United States contains many nations — some far older than the one that claims dominion over them.

To study Native history is not to look back in sorrow alone. It is to encounter living nations, ongoing resistance, and the possibility of a more honest future.

Welcome to the conversation.